Storm King on the Hudson

Samuel Colman, Storm King on the Hudson, 1866, oil on canvas, 32 ¹⁄₈ x 59 ⁷⁄₈ in. (81.6 x 152.0 cm.), Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of John Gellatly, 1929.6.20

Free to use

Artwork Details

Title: Storm King on the Hudson
Artist: Samuel Colman
Date: 1866
Location: Smithsonian American Art Museum
/
2nd Floor
/
East Wing
Dimensions: 32 ¹⁄₈ x 59 ⁷⁄₈ in. (81.6 x 152.0 cm.)
Credit Line: Gift of John Gellatly
Mediums: oil
Mediums Description: oil on canvas
Classifications: Painting
Subjects: Figure group
Landscape — river — Hudson River
Architecture — boat — riverboat
Architecture — boat — rowboat
Architecture — boat — sailboat
Landscape — mountain — Storm King
Landscape — New York
Object Number: 1929.6.20
Linked Open Data: https://edan.si.edu/saam/id/object/1929.6.20

Artwork Description

The Hudson River was a beloved subject for American landscape painters, and this particular site was popular with artists in part due to the dramatic storms that gathered along the ridge of Storm King Mountain. By 1866, the river had become a major commercial route for trade as well as tourism, providing stone and other materials needed to build a rapidly expanding New York City further south. This was the point where the major water routes from the north met the railhead for the trains heading south, and commodities were offloaded from ships and onto trains. Samuel Colman painted both small sailboats and larger steam-powered tourist launches and freight boats, focusing on the changes taking place in commerce and leisure activities on the river. The painter's nod to the transition from sail to steam interjects a modern note about progress in a classic landscape.

Works by this artist (5 items)

View all artworks

Storm King on the Hudson

Artist

Samuel Colman

Date1866

oil on canvas

Clearing Storm at Gibraltar

Artist

Samuel Colman

Dateca. 1860

oil on canvas

The Olive Trees of the Riviera (from the portfolio, Twenty…

Artist

Samuel Colman

Date1884

etching on parchment

Kanawha River Valley

Artist

Samuel Colman

Dateca. 1888-1890

oil on canvas

Videos

Video Player is loading.

Current Time 0:00

Duration 0:00

Loaded: 0.00%

Stream Type LIVE

Remaining Time 0:00

Smithsonian American Art Museum Director Elizabeth Broun shares her thoughts about personal favorites from the museum collection. Learn more about Storm King on the Hudson by Samuel Colman.

BETSY BROUN: Kay Larsen, art critic for New York Magazine, wrote about this 1866 painting of “Storm King on the Hudson” by Samuel Colman. She said it “marks the moment when paradise was invaded by men of commerce. Painters were left with a problem: what to do about the tanning factories, sawmills, paper factories, and the other small businesses that started to overtake the epic waterfalls and elegant forests along the Hudson.” The debates we still have today about competing claims of preservation and development were already major issues in the mid-nineteenth century. Samuel Colman gave equal time to both sides of the discussion by dividing his painting neatly into halves.

The protagonist of the right half is the mountain that was known to many as “Butter Hill” because of its soft, rounded shape. Today, we call it “Storm King Mountain”, a tribute to the frequent dark clouds that shroud its top. Colman gives nearly a third of the height of his canvas to these impressive clouds. Below the mountain is a vision of olden days, just passing into history about the time of the Civil War. Small boats hug the shore, and in the foreground, three men fish with nets. It’s clearly a family or local enterprise.

The left half represents the industrialized future. Giant commercial barges are linked together, their huge paddle wheels turned by coal-generated steam. Smoke stacks are at the center of this half of the composition, a threatening industrial parallel to the dark clouds over Storm King Mountain. The barges seem to bare down menacingly on the small fishing craft.

The two halves, we realize, are tenuously linked underwater by the fragile nets of the fishermen. It is as if Colman already knew that the uneasy coexistence of these two ways of life in his own present would soon be severed into two very different worlds: past and future. By carefully arranging his picture as a double square, Colman keeps the debate about industry and nature in balance. Are the barges symbols of promise and progress? Or are they destroyers?